Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2012

Federal Circuit Confirms That U.S. Priority Claim Must Be Considered When Assessing Interference Timeliness

In "Loughlin v. Ling", the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision of the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In Loughlin v. Ling, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision of the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences that had canceled the sole claim of Loughlin's patent in an interference proceeding. The decision turned on the interplay between the interference statute of limitations (35 USC § 135(b)(2)) and the domestic priority statute (35 USC § 120).

The Patent and Application At Issue

Loughlin's patent (U.S. 7,434,426) was filed on May 13, 2004 and prosecuted under application no. 10/845,624. The '624 application was published on November 18, 2004. After several years of pendency, claim 42 was allowed and the patent issued October 14, 2008 with that single claim.

Ling's application (11/671,404) was filed on February 5, 2007, and claimed priority under 35 USC § 120 to application no. 10/759,413, filed on January 16, 2004. Coincidentally, Ling's parent application was published on the same day as Loughlin's application, due to their similar foreign and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from