Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2024

Federal Circuit Clarifies Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rule

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

On August 13, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the Court) decided Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., C.A. No. 2024-1061...

United StatesIntellectual Property

On August 13, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the Court) decided Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., C.A. No. 2024-1061, finding that a first-filed, first-issued, later-expired claim cannot be invalidated by a later-filed, later-issued, earlier-expiring reference claim having a common priority date.

Allergan involved U.S. Patent No. 7,741,356 (the '356 patent), the first-ever patent to cover eluxadoline, which was filed on March 14, 2005, issued on June 22, 2010, and was awarded 1,107 days of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA). The '356 patent was assigned to Janssen, who disclaimed all but 467 days of PTA during the application for patent term extension.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from