Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2023

Explanations, Not Bare Citations, Needed To Establish Prior Art Date

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Although provisional applications can be used to secure an earlier date for 102(e), the petitioner bears the burden of production in establishing a prior art date for the asserted prior art.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Although provisional applications can be used to secure an earlier date for 102(e), the petitioner bears the burden of production in establishing a prior art date for the asserted prior art. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") explored this nuance when Motorola Mobility LLC ("Motorola") claimed a patent's provisional application supported a later-filed patent ("Hunzinger") in arguing that Hunzinger was prior art to Maxell, Ltd's ("Maxell") patent, U.S. 7,072,673. Motorola Mobility LLC v. Maxell, LTD, No. IPR2023-00110 (P.T.A.B. June 15, 2023) ("Decision").

Motorola attempted to predate the challenged '673 patent under 102(e) using a provisional application ("Hunzinger Provisional") because the reference itself, Hunzinger, was filed after the challenged patent. Decision at 13. The PTAB noted that petitioners begin with the burdens of persuasion and production to show unpatentability. Id. at 19. The burden of production may shift to the patent owner after a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from