Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2020

District Court Rules DNA Analysis Claims Reciting Mathematical Algorithms Ineligible Under § 101

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

The District Court for the Northern District of Ohio dismissed Cybergenetics Corp.'s infringement suit after determining that the asserted claims

United StatesIntellectual Property

The District Court for the Northern District of Ohio dismissed Cybergenetics Corp.'s infringement suit after determining that the asserted claims—which recite mathematical algorithms for analyzing data taken from a DNA sample—are patent ineligible under the Alice two-step framework. That is, the court ruled that the claims are directed to an “abstract idea” and do not include an “inventive concept.”

The Cybergenetics patents at issue—U.S. Patent Nos. 8,898,021 and 9,708,642—describe a variation of a traditional method of identifying an individual based on a DNA sample. The traditional method uses “PCR (polymerase chain reaction) amplification” to transform the DNA sample into data that are unique to an individual and thus can be used to identify that individual. The method is not useful, however, when the sample contains DNA from multiple sources because the transformed data are “mixed” and do not correspond to one individual.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from