Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 AUGUST 2015

Delivering Architectural Plans May Create Implied License

Dan Wilson Homes (Wilson), a home construction company, hired Hunn Designs (Hunn) to complete architectural plans for four custom homes.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Hunn v. Dan Wilson Homes, Inc.

Where an architectural draftsman left his design firm mid-project and later used partial plans drawn during his employment to complete the project, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the ruling that the draftsman and his client had an implied license to use the draft plans and thus did not infringe the firm's copyrights. Hunn v. Dan Wilson Homes, Inc., Case Nos. 13-11297, 14-10365 (5th Cir., June 15, 2015) (Elrod, J.).

Dan Wilson Homes (Wilson), a home construction company, hired Hunn Designs (Hunn) to complete architectural plans for four custom homes. Ben Lack, a draftsman employed at Hunn, created partial plans and delivered paper copies to Wilson and the homeowners at several weekly meetings. Before Lack had completed the project, he disclosed to Hunn that he wished to resign, which led to his termination. Hunn asked that Lack return the physical files from the Wilson project but did not ask for the AutoCAD

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from