Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2017

Delayed Payment Proves Fatal For Cultec's PTAB Challenge

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Thus, a petition must meet all of the filing requirements of 37 C.F.R. 42.106 prior to the one year bar to be considered for institution.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b), a petition for inter partes review (IPR) may not be filed more than one year after the date on which the petitioner was served with a patent infringement complaint. Thus, a petition must meet all of the filing requirements of 37 C.F.R. 42.106 prior to the one year bar to be considered for institution.

An IPR petition under 37 C.F.R. 42.106 must: (1) include all required content as outlined in section 42.104; (2) be effectively served on the patent owner; and (3) be accompanied by the institution fee. If a petition fails to meet all of these requirements, no filing date will be accorded until the deficiencies are corrected. If such a failure is not remedied before the § 315(b) one-year bar kicks in, the petitioner may lose all chances for a PTAB challenge.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from