Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2025

D.C. Circuit Rejects Copyrightability Of Artwork Created Autonomously By AI

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

In a unanimous opinion issued by the D.C. Circuit on March 18, 2025, the Court of Appeals affirmed denial of Dr. Stephen Thaler's application to register a copyright protection...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a unanimous opinion issued by the D.C. Circuit on March 18, 2025, the Court of Appeals affirmed denial of Dr. Stephen Thaler's application to register a copyright protection for a work created by his generative artificial intelligence system, holding that the Copyright Act requires human authorship.

Dr. Thaler's AI System and "A Recent Entrance to Paradise"

Dr. Thaler created a generative AI system named "Creativity Machine." Creativity Machine then autonomously created an artwork, which Thaler titled "A Recent Entrance to Paradise." Once Creativity Machine got to work, no human was involved. In 2019, Thaler applied for copyright registration from the US Copyright Office. In his application, Thaler only listed Creativity Machine as the author, and listed himself as the owner. Consistent with the long-standing requirement that copyright protection requires human authorship, the Copyright Office denied his application.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from