Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JANUARY 2026

D. Mass Patent Litigation Update: November 2025

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

In Ocean Semiconductors LLC v. Analog Devices Inc., No. 24-cv-11759-PBS, Magistrate Judge Levenson issued two orders addressing discovery disputes brought by Plaintiff.

United StatesIntellectual Property

This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

In Ocean Semiconductors LLC v. Analog Devices Inc., No. 24-cv-11759-PBS, Magistrate Judge Levenson issued two orders addressing discovery disputes brought by Plaintiff.

First, the Court denied additional Rule 30(b)(6) testimony of Defendant, finding that Plaintiff's prior deposition delved into subject matter not grounded in the claims of the asserted patents and that the requested discovery was “marginally, if at all, relevant.”

Next, the Court compelled responses to “sixteen broad interrogatories” after narrowing the scope to focus on the subject matter claimed by the patent at issue and thus “tailored to meet the needs of this case.”

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from