This is the third in a series of articles discussing recent
orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States
District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
In Blue Engine Biologics v. Arteriocyte Medical
Systems Inc., No. 1:21-cv-11098-DJC, on February 10,
2022, Judge Casper denied Defendant's motion to dismiss
direct infringement claims in Blue Engine's amended
complaint, finding Blue Engine had asserted a plausible claim.
On a motion to dismiss, courts conduct a two-step,
context-specific inquiry, consistent with Garcia-Catalán
v. United States, 734 F.3d 100, 103 (1st Cir. 2013), namely,
(1) accepting factual allegations as true, and (2) determining
whether the factual allegations present a “reasonable
inference that the defendant is liable for the conduct
alleged.” In short, courts apply a “plausibility
threshold” that “does not demand a high degree of
factual specificity.” Id.