Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 DECEMBER 2023

Crossing The Blurred Line Between Brands And Generics

Axinn
Axinn
Contributor
Axinn

Axinn

Incisive. Inclusive. Invested. We’re Axinn. Experienced, tenacious, and always trial-ready, we are...

View firm profile
Explore more from Axinn

Clients often ask if a law firm can represent both brand and generic drug manufacturers. It's a reasonable question, particularly when the popular perception is that potential conflicts pigeonhole...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Clients often ask if a law firm can represent both brand and generic drug manufacturers. It's a reasonable question, particularly when the popular perception is that potential conflicts pigeonhole law firms, forcing them to "pick a side" and represent either brands or generics. But the reality is that firms can and do represent both "sides" of the brand-generic divide, especially given the recent consolidations among companies.

Increased consolidation in the pharmaceutical industry has produced an ecosystem in which many companies manufacture both brand and generic drugs. Because some brand manufacturers have their own generic subsidiaries and others are permitted to sell generic versions of their own brand drugs, the brand-generic divide is more blurry than popular perception might suggest. As the industry continues more than a decade of sustained consolidation, it may be time to retire the "pick a side" paradigm in pharmaceutical patent litigation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from