Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2026

Considerations And Strategies For Patenting AI

Gesmer Updegrove LLP
Gesmer Updegrove LLP
Contributor
Gesmer Updegrove LLP

Gesmer Updegrove LLP

The Firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP is a Boston-based law firm serving technology companies, emerging...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gesmer Updegrove LLP

Artificial intelligence and machine learning inventions present unique patenting challenges that require careful strategic choices between patent and trade secret protection. This guide examines how to frame AI/ML innovations as concrete technical improvements, structure claims around specific architectural features and processing steps, and draft specifications that satisfy eligibility and disclosure requirements.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Key Takeaways:

  • The patent-versus-trade-secret choice turns on detectability. Patent what is observable in products, publications, or standards, and consider trade secret for contributions hidden in non-observable model internals. The two can be layered.
  • Subject-matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 depends on framing the invention as a concrete technical improvement or practical application, not a desired result or business outcome.
  • Recite specific technical features (model architecture, processing steps, data handling, and special-purpose hardware) as an ordered combination of input, processing, and output limitations.
  • Draft for enforcement. Keep each independent claim performable by a single actor and tied to observable activity, and separate training claims from inference claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from