Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2019

Communications With, And Criticism By, FDA In Analyzing Obviousness

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Federal Circuit rejected Neptune's argument.

United StatesIntellectual Property

On April 26, 2019, the Federal Circuit affirmed three final written decisions of the Patent and Trial Appeal Board ("Board") in related inter partes reviews ("IPRs") in which the Board upheld the patentability of all the claims of U.S. Patent 7,772,209 ("the '209 patent") over obviousness challenges.1 Neptune Generics, LLC v. Eli Lilly & Co., — F.3d –, No. 2018-1257, 2019 WL 1868289 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 26, 2019). This decision provides insightful guidance on the proper use of evidence relating to FDA regulatory review—such as communications with the FDA and the skepticism of FDA medical officers—in determining obviousness.

The '209 patent is listed in the FDA Orange Book for ALIMTA® (pemetrexed disodium), an antifolate drug marketed by Lilly and approved for treating certain types of lung cancer and mesothelioma. The claims of the '209 patent are directed to a method of administering pemetrexed by pretreating patients with both folic acid and a methylmalonic acid

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from