Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 DECEMBER 2018

"Blurred Lines" Final Judgment May Signal Paradigm Shift For Entertainment Copyright Law

In March 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a landmark decision in the copyright infringement litigation surrounding Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's song, "Blurred Lines."

United StatesIntellectual Property
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

In March 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a landmark decision in the copyright infringement litigation surrounding Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's song, "Blurred Lines." The appellate court upheld a 2015 jury verdict finding that "Blurred Lines" infringed Marvin Gaye's copyright to the 1977 hit "Got to Give it Up" because the two songs were too similar.

In early December 2018, rather than petitioning for Supreme Court review, Williams and Thicke agreed to a judgment requiring payments of nearly $5 million to Gaye's family and an ongoing royalty of 50% of any future net proceeds from "Blurred Lines."

This controversial case has shifted the paradigm in the music and entertainment business by allowing a copyright owner to extend its claim to cover prior works that "inspired" a later artist to create a new work. We believe the result in this case will lead to a rise in copyright infringement litigation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from