Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 AUGUST 2025

Another Fender-Bender Between LKQ And GM

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

We have covered the LKQ v. GM design patent disputes from the PTAB decision through appeal and en banc rehearing. And now we report on yet another chapter in the saga between these parties

United StatesIntellectual Property

We have covered the LKQ v. GM design patent disputes from the PTAB decision through appeal and en banc rehearing. And now we report on yet another chapter in the saga between these parties.

Background. LKQ and GM took an earlier dispute all the way to the en banc Federal Circuit, who changed long-settled design patent obviousness law by overruling the decades-old Rosen-Durling test for obviousness and replacing it with a more flexible standard under KSR v. Teleflex and Graham v. John Deere. Whether and how the new LKQ standard impacts the obviousness analysis remains a developing area of law as courts apply the new rules. And a recent summary judgment decision that arose in another LKQ v. GM dispute highlights some of the contours of the new doctrine, particularly in the automotive design space.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from