Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2026

Analysing Various Approaches To Holistic Inventive Step At The UPC

J A Kemp
J A Kemp
Contributor
J A Kemp

J A Kemp

J A Kemp is one of the largest European patent and trade mark attorney firms, with offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from J A Kemp

The UPC Court of Appeal has endorsed a more holistic approach to assessing inventive step in patent disputes, marking a significant development in European patent law. This analysis examines how the UPC's methodology compares with the EPO's problem-solution approach and the practices of national courts like those in the UK and Germany.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Across Europe, the question to be asked when assessing inventive step is: would the invention have been obvious to the person skilled in the art at the priority date? However, there is no mandated test or framework for assessing this question, and so the EPO and different national courts have developed their own approaches. These approaches range from the EPO’s “problem-solution approach”, which provides a sequence of steps that is often described as rather formulaic, to more “holistic” approaches, such as those of the UK and Germany.

Against that background, the UPC – a specialist court for considering disputes concerning European patents – is still developing its jurisprudence, having only begun operations on 1 June 2023. At the end of 2025, the UPC Court of Appeal handed down two judgments endorsing a more holistic approach to inventive step. Here, we look at the approach set out by the court and assess how it compares to those of the EPO and the national courts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from