Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 SEPTEMBER 2023

A Primer On Patent Apportionment

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

35 U.S.C. § 284 provides that, where infringement is found, "the court shall award . . . damages adequate to compensate for the infringement but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer."

United StatesIntellectual Property

Introduction

35 U.S.C. § 284 provides that, where infringement is found, "the court shall award . . . damages adequate to compensate for the infringement but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer." What is a reasonable royalty?

Typically, a reasonable royalty is estimated using the "hypothetical negotiation approach," which "attempts to ascertain the royalty upon which the parties would have agreed had they successfully negotiated an agree- ment just before the infringement began."2 While a reasonable royalty may be a lump sum, most commonly it is calculated as the product of two values: a royalty base and a royalty rate. The royalty base reflects the revenue netted by sale of an infringing product, while the roy- alty rate indicates the percentage of each product sale that would, in the hypothetical negotiation, be paid to the patentee.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from