Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 OCTOBER 2026

Intellectual Property Report

Baker Botts L.L.P.
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Contributor
Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts is a leading international law firm with 11 offices located in the US, Europe, and the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker Botts L.L.P.

From Lululemon's strategic response to dupe culture to landmark trade dress victories and AI-powered patent analysis, this intellectual property report examines how brands are adapting their protection strategies in an era of social media influence and technological transformation. The collection explores critical developments in trademark law, patent prosecution, and the evolving intersection of artificial intelligence with IP due diligence.

United StatesIntellectual Property
Baker Botts
Baker Botts

"Lululemon Dupe": Rethinking Brand Protection in the Age of Dupe Culture

Alexis Symcheck Robison

“Dupe culture” has become a consumer movement built around affordable imitations of premium products, with influencers posting side-by-side comparisons under hashtags like #LululemonDupe, which has amassed over a billion views on TikTok. Rather than simply fighting the phenomenon, Lululemon has also sought to engage with the language consumers use to describe products that imitate its offerings. 

Continue Reading

Double Standard for Double Patenting

Benjamin Rosen, Sam Kwiatkowski

After In re Cellect and Allergan v. MSN provided guidance on the administration of obviousness-type double patenting in view of patent term adjustments, the doctrine’s next question has been asked. Can an obviousness-type double patenting rejection rest on the risk of harassment alone, even when no patent term is being extended? The USPTO’s Appeals Review Panel says it can, and the Federal Circuit is poised to decide the question in In re Ablynx.

Continue Reading

Pastel Pints and Crimped Crusts: What's New in Trade Dress Law

Julie Albert, Julie Tortora

The past few months have been sweet for trade dress plaintiffs. This summer, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued a significant decision in Van Leeuwen Ice Cream LLC v. Rebel Creamery LLC, No. 1:21-cv-02356. The court found that Rebel Creamery intentionally copied Van Leeuwen’s distinctive ice cream packaging trade dress and awarded $23.785 million in disgorgement of Rebel’s profits. Just a month later, J.M. Smucker fended off Trader Joe’s partial motion to dismiss Smucker’s federal dilution claim concerning the fame of design marks associated with Smucker’s “Uncrustables” products in J.M. Smucker Company v. Trader Joe’s Company, No. 5:25-cv-02181 (N.D. Ohio). Together, the cases illustrate the markedly different showings required at the pleading and trial stages, while also underscoring the importance of defining the asserted trade dress and developing evidence of distinctiveness, recognition, confusion, and nonfunctionality. 

Continue Reading

Patent Due Diligence in the AI Era

Robert Maier

Artificial intelligence is reshaping patent practice from two directions at once. New patents covering machine learning and related technologies are issuing at a pace of tens of thousands each year, steadily enlarging the body of rights a company developing AI products may need to account for in assessing patent infringement risk for new product releases.

At the same time, AI-assisted tools have transformed the work of mining those patents and measuring them against a product in development, helping to compress weeks of analysis into days. The same technology that is filling in the patent landscape is making that landscape far easier to see.

Continue Reading 

August 2026 Intellectual Property Report Recap

In case you missed it, here is a link to our August 2026 Intellectual Property Report.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from