Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2024

Intellectual Property Report

Baker Botts L.L.P.
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Contributor
Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts is a leading international law firm with 11 offices located in the US, Europe, and the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker Botts L.L.P.

It is well-established that the availability of a prior art reference is dependent on the "effective filing date" of a patent or patent application. Any practitioner seeking to invalidate a patent knows...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Dangers of Secret Prior Art

Brianna Potter

It is well-established that the availability of a prior art reference is dependent on the "effective filing date" of a patent or patent application. Any practitioner seeking to invalidate a patent knows that the ideal references used both for prior art and for demonstrating the knowledge of a POSITA will have been made public before the effective filing date of the patent in question.

However, there is yet a question of whether references filed before but published after a patent's priority date can be used to show what would be known by a POSITA at the time of invention. In a recent decision in the Northern District of West Virginia, Chief Judge Thomas discussed exactly this issue when denying a Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from