Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 APRIL 2015

Application Exclusion Bars Coverage For Claims Arising From Known, Undisclosed Circumstance

In Crown Capital, the policyholder seeking coverage was a securities firm that had recommended clients make investments in real estate companies that eventually were determined to be part of a Ponzi scheme...

United StatesInsurance

A California Court of Appeal has affirmed a summary judgment in favor of the insurer on defense and indemnity with respect to claims that arose from circumstances known to the policyholder when it applied for professional liability insurance but that were not disclosed to the insurer in the application. Crown Capital Securities, L.P. v. Endurance American Specialty Ins. Co. (Cal.Ct.App, 2d Dist., Div. 5, 4/10/15). Because the application stated that a claim is excluded from coverage if arising from any undisclosed circumstance that was required to be disclosed in response to a question asked, and the application requested disclosure of circumstances that may result in a claim, the policyholder was not entitled to coverage for claims arising from the known but undisclosed circumstance.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from