Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JULY 2005

When is a Break-up Fee not a Break-up Fee?

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

A break-up or termination fee is commonly paid to a prospective purchaser if a contemplated transaction is not consummated for reasons specified in the purchase agreement, including the seller’s acceptance of a competing bid.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

A break-up or termination fee is commonly paid to a prospective purchaser if a contemplated transaction is not consummated for reasons specified in the purchase agreement, including the seller’s acceptance of a competing bid. It is intended both to reimburse a "stalking horse" bidder for costs incurred in connection with due diligence and to compensate for the time, resources, effort and lost opportunity costs and risks incurred by a disappointed purchaser. Although break-up fees are a common feature of many transactions outside of bankruptcy, bankruptcy courts have sometimes struggled to determine whether, and under what circumstances, such fees should be approved as priority administrative expenses in a bankruptcy case. That issue was recently revisited by the bankruptcy appellate panel for the Eighth Circuit in In re Tama Beef Packing, Inc.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from