Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2015

Keeping Marblegate In Perspective: Implications For Debt Restructurings, Indenture Amendments And New Bond Issues

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

Involuntary debt restructurings that have the effect of impairing a bondholder's right to receive payment may violate the Trust Indenture Act.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Involuntary debt restructurings that have the effect of impairing a bondholder's right to receive payment may violate the Trust Indenture Act. This was recently held in the Marblegate/Education Management Corp. bondholder litigation. A first read of the case suggests potentially problematic implications. A deeper analysis shows a less troubling decision. The case is also relevant for the 144A for life market that is technically not subject to the statute.

  • Involuntary debt restructurings may violate the Trust Indenture Act if they have the effect of impairing a bondholder's right to receive payment, even though they leave that right formally intact. That was recently held by the court in the Marblegate/Education Management Corp. bondholder litigation. The SDNY's recent opinion on the merits (Marblegate II)1 confirmed its earlier holding on a request for a preliminary injunction to block the restructuring (Marblegate I)2.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from