Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2017

Debt Dialogue: July 2017

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

This month's issue of Debt Dialogue addresses recent developments and recurring issues that debt-focused investors commonly encounter in connection with enforcement of rights...

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This month's issue of Debt Dialogue addresses recent developments and recurring issues that debt-focused investors commonly encounter in connection with enforcement of rights, interpretation of documentation and other relevant matters.

Topics covered in this issue include:

  • A New Millennium: Bankruptcy Courts May Lack Constitutional Authority to Approve Nonconsensual Plan Releases
    While nonconsensual third party releases are inherently difficult to obtain as part of a confirmation order, a recent decision by the Delaware district court in Millennium Lab Holdings sets another roadblock to the bankruptcy court's authority to approve nonconsensual third-party releases. The district court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Stern v. Marshall, found that even where a bankruptcy court has jurisdiction to approve plan-based third-party releases, it may lack constitutional authority to approve those releases on a nonconsensual basis. The remand of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from