Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 OCTOBER 2017

September 2017 Bid Protest Roundup

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This roundup of notable bid protest decisions issued in September 2017 highlights three decisions, two at the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and one at the Court of Federal Claims (COFC).

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

This roundup of notable bid protest decisions issued in September 2017 highlights three decisions, two at the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and one at the Court of Federal Claims (COFC).  The first reminds us of the broadness of the discretion afforded a source selection official making a best-value tradeoff decision.  The second explores the line between products and services reasonably included in an offeror's General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contract, and those that must be separately provided.  And the last examines standing to continue a protest at COFC when intervening circumstances leave a disappointed offeror otherwise ineligible for award.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from