Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2015

Ruling In First Amendment Suit Strikes Down Charlottesville Panhandling Ordinance

My office off of Charlottesville’s downtown mall provides me with a great view of each day’s activities in this lively pedestrian space.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

My office off of Charlottesville's downtown mall provides me with a great view of each day's activities in this lively pedestrian space.  On any given day,  I can see the street musicians, vendors, or the blindfolded gentleman who gives away free hugs.  However, an interesting First Amendment case out of the Western District of Virginia is likely to ensure even more activity on Charlottesville's downtown mall. 

In a recent case, Judge Moon found that a Charlottesville ordinance, which prohibits panhandling on the downtown mall, violates the First Amendment of the Constitution.  The challenged ordinance specifically prohibited solicitation in a 50-foot "buffer zone" of portions of the mall.  The suit challenging the ordinance was filed in federal court over three years ago on behalf of several homeless Charlottesville residents and was initially dismissed by Judge Moon.  But after the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts "buffer zone" law last year, localities

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from