Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 NOVEMBER 2018

Recent And Upcoming Changes To The Illinois Human Rights Act

Ford Harrison LLP
Explore more from Ford Harrison LLP

On August 24, 2018, Governor Bruce Rauner signed into law Public Act 100-1066, which makes several significant changes to the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA).

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Kimberly Ross
Kimberly Ross
Author LinkedIn connections

On August 24, 2018, Governor Bruce Rauner signed into law Public Act 100-1066, which makes several significant changes to the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA). One additional important change occurred effective June 8, 2018. Additionally, with the November 6, 2018, election of Democratic Governor J. B. Pritzker, employers can expect more changes in the future, many of which may not be particularly employer-friendly.

Time to File Charge of Discrimination

The first change, which went into effect on June 8, 2018, after Public Act 100-588 was signed into law, gives Illinois employees 300 days to file a Charge of Discrimination with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR) for alleged violations of the IHRA. (This change was made with no publicity, possibly because it was quietly inserted at the end of a much longer bill amending an entirely different law.) Previously, Illinois employees only had 180 days to file a charge at the IDHR. Under federal law,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

SBA Extends Deadline For Comments On Historic Overhaul Of Size Standards

The Small Business Administration has extended the comment period for two proposed rules that could dramatically reshape federal government contracting by significantly expanding the pool of entities eligible for small business set-aside procurements. With some size standard thresholds proposed to increase as much as tenfold, these changes would fundamentally alter the makeup of the small business contractor base.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article

D.C. Circuit Rules Pentagon Can Exclude Anthropic From Supply Chain

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ruled that the Department of War can exclude Anthropic from its supply chain under the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act, finding that the AI company's ability to manipulate its Claude model creates a supply chain risk. This decision contrasts with an earlier California district court ruling that blocked a similar designation under a different statute, creating a complex legal landscape for AI providers and government contractors.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP
Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP
Article

FMCSA MOTUS Implementation – Common Motor Carrier Concerns

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration launched MOTUS in May 2026, replacing legacy registration platforms and fundamentally changing how motor carriers, freight brokers, and surface freight forwarders handle operating authority applications and license maintenance. While designed to combat fraud and streamline registration activities, the transition has created significant user experience challenges that threaten operating authority status and customer relationships for transportation service prov
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
Article

BIOSECURE Act Update: Court Enjoins WuXi AppTec’s 1260H Designation, but Strategic and Compliance Clocks Keep Running

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has preliminarily enjoined the Department of War from enforcing WuXi AppTec's Section 1260H designation, finding the agency misread its evidence on state and military affiliation. However, this ruling does not close alternative pathways to biotechnology company of concern (BCC) designation under the BIOSECURE Act, and earlier supply-chain restrictions continue to drive near-term compliance decisions with a critical June 30, 2027 deadline for sub-tier supp
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Article

Massachusetts’ 2026 Ballot Questions: What Clients Need To Know

Massachusetts voters will decide nine statewide ballot questions in November 2026 that could fundamentally reshape the state's legal, regulatory, and fiscal landscape. These measures address government transparency, election reforms, housing development, marijuana regulation, firearms laws, and state revenue limits, with implications extending far beyond Election Day to implementation, regulation, and ongoing policy debates.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Article

OFAC Broadens Cuba Sanctions And Restricts Payments And Travel

The U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control has implemented sweeping changes to Cuba sanctions, introducing a new regulatory framework that extends restrictions beyond U.S. persons to foreign entities and financial institutions. These measures eliminate key banking authorizations, expand transaction prohibitions to include intermediary payments, and significantly narrow travel permissions, creating new compliance challenges for businesses operating in or through Cuba-related channels.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Article

Weekly Sanctions Update: September 14, 2026

The Treasury Department intensifies economic pressure on Iran through Operation Economic Outcast, suspending aviation licenses and sanctioning dozens of entities while implementing a presumption of denial for Iran-related transactions. Meanwhile, new enforcement actions target Chinese cybercrime platforms, Ecuadorian terrorist organizations, and Israeli settlers, as Congress considers comprehensive Russia-Iran sanctions legislation.
GlobalGovernment, Public Sector
Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Article

DOL Takes Another Step Towards Eliminating The 80/20 Rule For Tipped Employees

On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2026-1, formally withdrawing three opinion letters that served as the foundation for the so-called “80/20 Rule” governing tipped employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The DOL also confirmed that its current enforcement guidance does not impose a percentage-based limit on the time a tipped employee may spend performing related, non-tip-producing duties. Instead, the inquiry focuses on whether the employee’s duties are related to the employee’s tipped occupation.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

Noncompete News Alert: Virginia Tightens the Rules on Noncompetes - What Employers Need to Know

Virginia's General Assembly has significantly expanded restrictions on noncompetition agreements, now covering most hourly employees and healthcare professionals while introducing new severance requirements for enforcement. Employers must navigate these evolving rules alongside traditional common law standards to avoid legal pitfalls when drafting or enforcing restrictive covenants.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

Get Ready Connecticut Employers: New Laws Take Effect October 1, 2026

Connecticut employers face significant changes to employment laws taking effect October 1, 2026, including expanded pay transparency requirements, new electronic monitoring notices, and AI-related disclosure obligations. The state legislature has amended multiple employment statutes affecting hiring practices, workplace monitoring, lactation accommodations, and employee protections. These changes require proactive policy reviews to ensure compliance and avoid civil penalties.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

Tax-Advantaged Employer Matching Contributions To Trump Accounts Now Available

The U.S. Department of Treasury has issued guidance on employer-sponsored Trump Account contribution programs, creating new tax-advantaged opportunities for employers to support employee savings for their children's future. Employers must navigate complex requirements analogous to dependent care assistance programs, including nondiscrimination rules, written plan documents, and compliance obligations under both the Internal Revenue Code and potentially ERISA. What are the key design considerations, tax impl
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

EEOC Response Deadlines May Be Shrinking: What Employers Need To Know About The 15-Day Trend

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may be enforcing a shortened deadline for employers to submit position statements in response to a Charge of Discrimination (Charge). Although the EEOC’s official policy does not appear to have changed, and its website still states that an employer “generally has 30 days to gather the information requested and to submit its position statement and attachments to the EEOC,” a growing number of employers across the United States are receiving notice of Charges that set a fifteen-day deadline for position statements, and extensions have become harder to obtain.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

EntertainHR: Home Runs And Hard Caps: The Looming MLB Labor Battle

As Major League Baseball's collective bargaining agreement approaches its December 2026 expiration, team owners are proposing a hard salary cap for the first time since the 1994 strike that cancelled the World Series. With the players' union historically opposed to salary caps and both sides holding firm on their positions, the league faces a real possibility of another work stoppage that could disrupt the 2027 season.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

Virtual Termination Meetings And AI: When Skynet Does Not Stop

A New Jersey employer faces a lawsuit after an AI transcription tool allegedly captured supervisors discussing their preference for a "strapping young man" to replace a terminated female employee. The case raises critical questions about the admissibility of AI-generated evidence in court and highlights the risks employers face when using virtual meeting platforms with automated transcription features.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP