Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2013

Non-Protestable Task Order Procurement Decision Shuts Out Incumbent Contractor

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ("COFC") serves as a reminder on the limits a contractor faces in protesting task and delivery order awards.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ("COFC") serves as a reminder on the limits a contractor faces in protesting task and delivery order awards. In MORI Associates, Inc. v. United States, No. 13-671C (2013), the COFC dismissed the pre-award bid protest by MORI, the incumbent contractor, for lack of jurisdiction because the protest challenged the Government's decision to obtain services through a task order competition under an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity ("IDIQ") Government-Wide Acquisition Contract ("GWAC") rather than through a General Services Administration ("GSA") Schedule contract.

The decision was the latest in a long-running series of disputes between MORI and a National Institutes of Health agency concerning the provision of IT services. MORI was awarded a 5-year contract for help desk support, as well as other IT services, in 2002. A follow-on procurement was attempted by soliciting quotations from firms that held a GSA Federal

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from