Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 AUGUST 2019

"Mistake" In Government Contracts

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Everyone knows that "ignorance of the law is no excuse." But what about ignorance of the facts? In Woodies Holdings, L.L.C. v. United States,

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

Everyone knows that "ignorance of the law is no excuse." But what about ignorance of the facts? In Woodies Holdings, L.L.C. v. United States, the Court of Federal Claims recently rejected a Government defense against a contractor claim and an affirmative counter-claim based on the Government's alleged unilateral mistake of fact. In this post we'll take a look at that decision and discuss the particular challenges posed by an argument that one party's mistaken understanding of facts should lead a court to alter the unambiguous terms of the parties' contract. We'll also note a special procedural hurdle one must clear before being able to raise this argument in an appeal covered by the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from