Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 APRIL 2004

Communications Law Bulletin - April 2004

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In April, the communications industry continues to see fallout from developments reported in our last two issues, including the Super Bowl half-time show incident, the possible regulation of voice-over-Internet-protocol services, and the judicial rejection of the Federal Communications Commission's ("FCC" or "Commission") <I>Triennial Review Order</I>. These and other items are covered here, along with our usual list of deadlines for your calendar.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

The Month in Brief

In April, the communications industry continues to see fallout from developments reported in our last two issues, including the Super Bowl half-time show incident, the possible regulation of voice-over-Internet-protocol services, and the judicial rejection of the Federal Communications Commission's ("FCC" or "Commission") Triennial Review Order. These and other items are covered here, along with our usual list of deadlines for your calendar.

Indecency Update

A number of items on the broadcast indecency front are worth noting, including news from Congress, the FCC, and the cable and broadcast industries.

In Congress, Senators Frist and Brownback failed in their attempt to get S.2056, which would have increased fines for broadcast indecency and subjected performers to those fines, placed on the Senate's unanimous consent calendar as a way to expedite voting. Thus, the Senate went into recess without voting on the bill. A number of entities including the American

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from