Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2017

When Confidential Supervisory Information Hinders Attorney-Client Relationships

Pryor Cashman LLP
Pryor Cashman LLP
Contributor
Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman is an award-winning midsize law firm headquartered in New York City. With over 200...

View firm profile
Explore more from Pryor Cashman LLP

In a recent article for the New York Law Journal, Partner Jeffrey Alberts and Associate Dustin Nofziger examined how federal regulations concerning confidential supervisory information can interfere...

United StatesFinance and Banking

In a recent article for the New York Law Journal, Partner Jeffrey Alberts, Co-Chair of Pryor Cashman's Financial Institutions Group, and Associate Dustin Nofziger examined how federal regulations concerning confidential supervisory information (CSI) can interfere with the attorney-client relationship.

"Attorneys who do not work in the banking space are often shocked to learn that federal banking regulators use regulations governing CSI to prevent banks and their officers and directors from consulting with outside counsel and to monitor that communication when it occurs," Alberts and Nofziger wrote. "When a bank, or one of its officers or directors, wants to seek legal advice concerning documents or information that a regulator deems to be 'CSI,' banking regulators take the position that this can only be done with prior agency approval." And because approval is often delayed, or even withheld completely, clients are unable to discuss critical CSI with counsel,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from