Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2016

U.S. Supreme Court To Consider "Valid When Made" Doctrine

Last year, the influential Second Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a troubling, and to many banking lawyers, plainly-wrong decision in Madden v. Midland Funding LLC.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Last year, the influential Second Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a troubling, and to many banking lawyers, plainly-wrong decision in Madden v. Midland Funding LLC.1 In that case, Midland had bought a credit card debt originated by a Delaware national bank, attempted to enforce the debt against the borrower, and apply the 27% interest rate under the credit card agreement. However, the borrower was a New York citizen, and the rate charged exceeded the New York criminal usury rate of 25%. Even though the originating lender was a national bank, the Second Circuit held that the national bank's debt buyer could not rely on the National Bank Act preemption of state usury law.2 The case is a departure from years of precedent, it creates a circuit split, and the debt buyer has asked the United States Supreme Court to review the decision.3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from