Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2007

Sutherland Study Finds That It Sometimes Pays To Litigate Against FINRA (Formerly NASD)

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP has completed its annual analysis of litigated disciplinary proceedings brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA, formerly NASD) against broker-dealer firms and registered representatives.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP has completed its annual analysis of litigated disciplinary proceedings brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA, formerly NASD) against broker-dealer firms and registered representatives. The study, authored by partner Brian L. Rubin and associate Christian J. Cannon, analyzes cases from January 2006 through June 2007 where the self-regulatory organization charged respondents with violating NASD rules and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and statutes.

What follows are among the findings of the study:

Trials

FINRA disciplinary proceedings begin when a complaint is filed, and culminate in a hearing before a Hearing Panel that comprises two current or former industry members and one Hearing Officer, who is a FINRA employee. The Hearing Officer serves as Chair of the Hearing Panel and oversees the proceedings with authority to make all rulings about the schedule, the procedures, and what evidence

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from