Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2018

OCC Files Amicus In Ninth Circuit Preemption Case

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Lusnak v. Bank of America, N.A.—holding that the National Bank Act did not preempt a California law requiring banks...

United StatesFinance and Banking

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Lusnak v. Bank of America, N.A.—holding that the National Bank Act did not preempt a California law requiring banks to pay interest on certain funds held in escrow accounts for mortgage borrowers—has received considerable attention in the consumer finance industry. Bank of America's bid for rehearing en banc was significantly strengthened on Monday, when the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") took the unusual step of filing an amicus curiae brief in support of the petition for rehearing.

Mayer Brown's Legal Update summarizes how, according to the OCC, the court got the preemption issue in Lusnak wrong.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from