Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2010

MoFo Tax Talk, Volume 3, Issue 3

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In the third quarter 2010, the Tax Court released its opinion in Anschutz Company v. Comm’r, 135 T.C. No. 5 (July 22, 2010), holding that the variable prepaid forward contract plus the stock loan at issue was a sale for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

United StatesFinance and Banking

EDITOR'S NOTE

In the third quarter 2010, the Tax Court released its opinion in Anschutz Company v. Comm'r, 135 T.C. No. 5 (July 22, 2010), holding that the variable prepaid forward contract plus the stock loan at issue was a sale for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The IRS also issued much anticipated guidance on the new Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ("FATCA") withholding and reporting rules and guidance (albeit limited) on the codification of the economic substance doctrine. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association also released a protocol on new Section 871(l) (redesignated recently as Section 871(m) by H.R. 1586) addressing withholding tax on certain cross-border equity swaps. FATCA withholding and reporting, economic substance, and Section 871(l) were part of new legislation enacted into law in March 2010.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from