Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2007

Hedge Fund Due Diligence: A US Litigator’s Perspective

Litigation, by its very nature, is backward looking.Trial counsel act as legal archeologists, attempting to determine what went wrong and when.Thus, litigation offers a unique opportunity to examine, with 20/20 hindsight, the issues and actions that led to failure.

United StatesFinance and Banking

By Jonathan Sablone and Timothy W. Mungovan1, Nixon Peabody LLP

Reprinted from the International Investment & Securities Review 2007

Litigation, by its very nature, is backward looking. Trial counsel act as legal archeologists, attempting to determine what went wrong and when. Thus, litigation offers a unique opportunity to examine, with 20/20 hindsight, the issues and actions that led to failure. With this information, litigators can offer tangible steps and strategies to avoid a recurrence. In some respects, litigation can be analogised to the "black box" on an aircraft – the information is of no benefit to the current victims, but immensely valuable to avoid future disasters.

This model of litigation as a risk management tool has special application to hedge funds. Most hedge funds offer little transparency into their investment strategies or operations. In addition, there have been a number of high profile blow-ups and failures in the past few years and there is no reason to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from