Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2013

Financial Advisory Update (December 2013)

Novel theories by plaintiffs’ lawyers need to foster novel approaches by M&A lawyers.

United StatesFinance and Banking
Jeffrey Rothschild
Jeffrey Rothschild
Author LinkedIn connections

Novel theories by plaintiffs' lawyers need to foster novel approaches by M&A lawyers.

A number of recent cases highlight the increasing risks for financial advisors and the lawyers who represent them. Financial advisors, and the lawyers who represent them, should be cognizant of these recent developments and heed their lessons as they work on transactions.

1. Rural/Metro

In a case awaiting decision in the Delaware Court of Chancery, Rural/Metro Corp. stockholders are suing the company's initial financial advisor on a theory of aiding and abetting the Rural/Metro board's breach of its fiduciary duties. Both the company's second financial advisor involved in the deal as well as the Rural/Metro board settled without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, leaving the initial financial advisor as the sole defendant. Financial advisors should be aware of this case because any success on the part of the plaintiffs could open up new obligations and potential avenues of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from