Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2008

Defining Hybrid Capital

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In the current environment of bank recapitalisations, it has never been more important for banks to know what capital-raising tools are at their disposal.

United StatesFinance and Banking

In the current environment of bank recapitalisations, it has never been more important for banks to know what capital-raising tools are at their disposal. However, despite the implementation of Basel II in Europe by the introduction of the Capital Requirements Directive ("CRD"), a common approach to the definition and treatment of eligible hybrid capital has eluded European member state regulators.

This in turn means that a level playing field for European banks as they compete for new capital is some way off.

One of the main purposes of the European Commission's recent Public Consultation on possible changes to the CRD is to provide clarity and uniformity as to the treatment of hybrid capital. It builds on the 1998 public statement on hybrid Tier 1 capital by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, known as the Sydney Press Release, and follows on from the "Proposal for a common EU definition

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from