Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 OCTOBER 2016

Court Rejects CFPB's RESPA Interpretation, Declares Single-Director Structure Unconstitutional

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Today, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a ruling overturning a $109 million monetary penalty imposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Today, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a ruling overturning a $109 million monetary penalty imposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB" or "Bureau"). The decision in PHH Corporation v. CFPB, written by Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, addressed the unconstitutionality of the Bureau's structure and its retroactive application of a new RESPA interpretation, and imposed RESPA's three-year statute of limitations on the Bureau.

As indicated above, the D.C. Circuit's decision addressed the following three issues:

  • It held, by a 2-1 vote, that the Bureau's structure violates the Constitution's separation-of-powers principles—because there is no multi-member bipartisan Commission and the single Director may be removed by the President only "for cause." The court's remedy was to invalidate the statutory provision permitting the President to remove the Director only for cause during the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from