Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2026

Challenging A Framework That Lets Discretion Override Statutory Access To The Federal Reserve’s Payment System

Winston Taylor filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether the Federal Reserve can deny master accounts to eligible depository institutions...

United StatesFinance and Banking

Winston Taylor filed an amicus brief on behalf of The Digital Chamber in Custodia Bank, Inc. v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors, urging the U.S. Supreme Court to address a question with direct implications for digital assets, financial innovation, and the future of the U.S. payments infrastructure: Does the Monetary Control Act permit Regional Reserve Banks to deny master accounts to eligible depository institutions?

A master account is direct access to the nation's payment rails. Without one, a chartered institution depends on correspondent banks whose services can be withdrawn at any time. One Tenth Circuit judge called a Bank’s denial of access to a master account “akin to a death sentence.” Under the Fed's Account Access Guidelines many institutions designed to serve the digital assets sector are relegated to Tier 3 review when seeking a master account, which a member of the Board has described as “unobtanium,” suggesting that those banks, despite statutory mandate, would

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from