Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2014

CFPB As HUD: Another Section 8 Consent Order Displays CFPB’s RESPA Approach

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In a recent RESPA enforcement action, the CFPB negotiated a consent order with Lighthouse Title, Inc. for alleged violations of RESPA’s prohibition against kickbacks.

United StatesFinance and Banking

In a recent Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA") enforcement action, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") negotiated a consent order with Lighthouse Title, Inc. ("Lighthouse") for alleged violations of RESPA's prohibition against kickbacks. RESPA Section 8(a) and its implementing regulation, Regulation X, prohibit parties from entering into an agreement to exchange fees, kickbacks, or things of value for the referral of settlement services in connection with a "federally related mortgage loan." 12 CFR 1024.14(b). In the Consent Order, the CFPB claimed that Lighthouse entered into marketing services agreements ("MSAs") for advertising with parties such as real estate brokers, and made payments related to these agreements based on the "volume or value of business referred" by such counterparties. As a result of this practice, the CFPB alleged that Lighthouse violated RESPA both for entering into the MSAs and for varying the fees it paid based on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from