Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 AUGUST 2011

Basel Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements For Remuneration

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In July 2009, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ("BCBS") published supplemental Pillar 2 (supervisory review process) guidance to address perceived weaknesses that were revealed in some banks’ risk management processes during the recent financial turmoil.

United StatesFinance and Banking

In July 2009, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ("BCBS") published supplemental Pillar 2 (supervisory review process) guidance to address perceived weaknesses that were revealed in some banks' risk management processes during the recent financial turmoil. The guidance included a set of "Principles for Sound Compensation Practices," which had been published in April 2009 by the Financial Stability Board ("FSB"). One of these Principles was that "Firms must disclose clear, comprehensive and timely information about their compensation practices." However, in March 2010, the FSB noted in its "Peer Review Report on Compensation" significant variances in compensation-related disclosure across different jurisdictions. This has led it to recommend that detailed disclosure requirements be incorporated into Pillar 3 (of Basel II) in order to be more prescriptive and engender greater uniformity across the different jurisdictions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from