Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2004

Arbitration: The Plaintiffs’ Bar Strikes Back

Arbitration provisions in consumer finance contracts came into widespread use in the mid-to-late 1990s as an effective industry antidote to the plague of class actions raging during that decade. Consumer finance companies and retailers saw the U.S. Supreme Court’s broad view of the reach of the Federal Arbitration Act (the FAA) in 1995’s Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson as a means not only to preclude runaway punitive damage verdicts in state courts but also to prevent class actions, the co

United StatesFinance and Banking
Thomas Byrne
Thomas Byrne

I. Introduction

Arbitration provisions in consumer finance contracts came into widespread use in the mid-to-late 1990s as an effective industry antidote to the plague of class actions raging during that decade. Consumer finance companies and retailers saw the U.S. Supreme Court’s broad view of the reach of the Federal Arbitration Act (the FAA) in 1995’s Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson 1 as a means not only to preclude runaway punitive damage verdicts in state courts but also to prevent class actions, the conventional wisdom then being that class arbitrations were not permitted under the FAA. In the ensuing years, arbitration provisions in consumer contracts became a kind of wonder drug, defeating or deterring the filing of many putative class actions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from