Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 APRIL 2019

Appellate Division Rejects MacPherson Mortgage Acceleration Argument In Case Of First Impression

In a case of appellate first impression in New York, the Appellate Division, Second Department held that a mortgage is accelerated upon a lender's election to do so, notwithstanding an optional reinstatement clause...

United StatesFinance and Banking

In a case of appellate first impression in New York, the Appellate Division, Second Department held that a mortgage is accelerated upon a lender's election to do so, notwithstanding an optional reinstatement clause in a mortgage. In the Dieudonne matter,1 the Second Department rejected the "MacPherson Argument," first pronounced by the Supreme Court, Suffolk County2 and affirmed the dismissal of the lender's foreclosure complaint as time-barred. The MacPherson Argument reasons that a mortgage with an optional reinstatement clause is not accelerated until judgment enters, as the borrower has an continuous right to reinstate until that point.

The Dieudonne decision will have significant impact on whether certain residential foreclosure actions are deemed timely commenced. In New York, the statute of limitations to foreclose a mortgage is six years. See CPLR 213(4). The commencement of a foreclosure action is the most common way that lenders take an affirmative act to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

See more popular content from