Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2018

Alternative Investment Liquidity Should Determine Asset Manager Compensation: AIMA Study

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Ten years on from the 2008 financial crisis, some of the market conditions from that time are returning, including contracted liquidity ...

United StatesFinance and Banking

Source

Ten years on from the 2008 financial crisis, some of the market conditions from that time are returning, including contracted liquidity, according to Tom Kehoe Global Head of Research, AIMA. In a research study, AIMA explores the issue of liquidity and alternative investments, looking at several facets. Kehoes explains that since 2008, asset managers collaborated and formed bespoke liquidity conditions for specific alternative investment funds to match the requirements of invested instruments, and established investor-level gates to prevent forced portfolio liquidation to meet redemptions. He argues that from an investor perspective, portfolio and fund liquidity should work together, as liquid funds provide less space to gate or suspend redemptions. Since alternative investments can offer greater liquidity, the assets managers handling them should be compensated accordingly, unless investors agree to lower fees and longer lock-ups.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from