Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MARCH 2012

A "Loan Workout Plan" Is Not An Agreement To Modify A Loan

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

In Nungaray v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1499, the California Court of Appeal held that (i) a Loan Workout Plan is not an enforceable agreement to modify a loan and (ii) a bank does not violate the "one-form-of-action" rule by accepting payments under such a Plan, then proceeding with foreclosure.

United StatesFinance and Banking

In Nungaray v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1499, the California Court of Appeal held that (i) a Loan Workout Plan is not an enforceable agreement to modify a loan and (ii) a bank does not violate the "one-form-of-action" rule by accepting payments under such a Plan, then proceeding with foreclosure.

The Nungarays refinanced their home in 2006, then later defaulted on their loan. The bank initiated non-judicial foreclosure proceedings. In response, the Nungarays negotiated a Loan Workout Plan pending consideration for a permanent loan modification. The Plan required the Nungarays to make monthly payments from August to November 2009 and also called for the Nungarays to provide certain financial records to the defendants necessary to determine whether the loan should be permanently modified. The Nungarays made the necessary payments but failed to provide the financial information required. The bank denied their request for modification and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from