Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JANUARY 2009

A Compilation Of Enforcement And Non-Enforcement Actions - December 2008

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) recently held that an investment adviser lacked standing to file a securities claim on behalf of its injured investors.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Non-Enforcement Matters

Investment Advisers May Not File Securities Claims on Behalf of Investors Except in Certain Cases

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) recently held that an investment adviser lacked standing to file a securities claim on behalf of its injured investors. See W.R. Huff Asset Management Co. v. Deloitte & Touche, Nos. 06-1664-cv(L), 06-1749(con) (2d Cir. December 3, 2008). According to the Second Circuit, investment advisers suffer no injury-in-fact even when their investors may have suffered a constitutionally redressable injury.

Under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, in order to have standing, a claimant must be able to point to a "concrete and particularized harm to a legally protected interest." To meet this constitutional threshold for standing, the claimant must show: an injury-in-fact, the alleged unlawful conduct must have caused the injury, and the courts must have the ability to redress the alleged injury. If a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from