Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2013

Which Is Worse? EPA Oversight Or Citizen Oversight?

Everyone who represents PRPs in Superfund settlements has his or her own horror stories regarding the scope of EPA’s oversight cost claims.

United StatesEnvironment

Everyone who represents PRPs in Superfund settlements has his or her own horror stories regarding the scope of EPA's oversight cost claims.  We all know that oversight costs can end up as an appreciable percentage of total site costs.  We've all cringed to go to meetings with EPA and see not just multiple EPA employees in the room, but several disembodied voices from EPA's Ada, Oklahoma, lab.  Insult to injury is when there are 3 or 4 representatives of EPA's outside oversight contractor.  Further insult to injury is added for those of us from states such as Massachusetts or New Jersey that have privatized cleanup systems.  We know that many state sites could be federal NPL sites – and vice-versa – and we wonder why the federal sites warrant 10 different people providing oversight and why our client must pay for those costs, when other sites presenting comparable risks are effectively cleaned up without such oversight.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from