Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 AUGUST 2013

The Third Circuit Reinstates Nuisance Claims Against Cheswick Generating: Bad Idea

The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals recently revived class action nuisance claims brought by residential property owners living within one mile of GenOn's Cheswick Generating Station.

United StatesEnvironment

On Wednesday, in Bell v. Cheswick Generating Station, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals revived class action nuisance claims brought by residential property owners living within one mile of GenOn's Cheswick Generating Station. (Full disclosure – this firm represents GenOn, now NRG, in various matters, though not this litigation.) The District court had ruled that the claims were preempted by the Clean Air Act's comprehensive regulatory scheme. The 3rd Circuit disagreed, holding that the CAA's savings clause preserved such nuisance claims.

While I understand the logic of the Court's decision, it nonetheless seems not just wrong, but willfully wrong. The 3rd Circuit relied on the Supreme Court decision in International Paper Co. v. Ouellette, which held that the savings clause in the Clean Water Act preserved at least some state law tort claims, as long as the plaintiffs only seek to apply the law of the source state.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from