Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2022

The Drumbeat Of PFAS Litigation Is Getting Louder

On May 25th, Massachusetts filed suit against a number of companies alleged to have manufactured PFAS and/or aqueous film-forming foam.

United StatesEnvironment

On May 25th, Massachusetts filed suit against a number of companies alleged to have manufactured PFAS and/or aqueous film-forming foam.  Massachusetts joins a number of other states which have already brought similar claims.  Indeed, Massachusetts filed the case in South Carolina, where an existing multi-district litigation concerning PFAS is already in progress.

The complaint asserts a number of different claims, including trespass and nuisance, but its focus is really product liability.  FWIW, the MDL in South Carolina is captioned "In re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) Products Liability Litigation."  Notwithstanding that the suit has been brought as a products liability case, the relief sought is right out of a standard CERCLA or state superfund law complaint.  Its first request for relief asks the Court to:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

To view Foley Hoag's Law and the Environment Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from