Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 DECEMBER 2024

The Appellate Division Questions Access For Investigation Under The Access Statute

Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti
Explore more from Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti

This case addresses site access to third-party property under New Jersey's Access Statute (N.J.S.A. 58:10B-16). The remediating party sought court-ordered access...

United StatesEnvironment

What You Need to Know

  • This case addresses site access to third-party property under New Jersey's Access Statute (N.J.S.A. 58:10B-16). The remediating party sought court-ordered access to install groundwater monitoring wells, but the property owner resisted, citing redevelopment concerns.
  • The trial court granted access based on the LSRP's affidavit, which stated that redevelopment could proceed without damaging the wells if "customary care" was used. The property owner provided conflicting expert testimony about the feasibility of coexisting activities.
  • The Appellate Division overturned the trial court's decision, stating that the conflicting expert opinions required a plenary evidentiary hearing before resolution.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from