Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JUNE 2007

Supreme Court Upholds Private Right Of Action Under CERCLA

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

A unanimous Supreme Court has removed any doubt about a private party's right to sue for environmental response costs under the federal Superfund.

United StatesEnvironment

A unanimous Supreme Court has removed any doubt about a private party's right to sue for environmental response costs under the federal Superfund. In U.S. v. Atlantic Research Corporation, Case No. 06-562, the Court addressed the question left open by its prior decision in the well-known case of Cooper v. Aviall Services, Inc., 543 U.S. 157, regarding whether a potentially responsible party ("PRP") may sue another under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), otherwise known as the Superfund. The Atlantic Research Court answered the question "yes," holding that the plain meaning of CERCLA Section 107(a)(4)(B) provides for such a cause of action.

Until the Cooper decision, the courts had generally held that both the federal and state governments, and private parties, had a federal court cause of action under CERCLA to sue other PRPs for recovery of environmental response costs. The Cooper decision held that a right for contribution existed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from